纪检监察机关深入基层沉到一线 以实调研筑牢工作基础******
纪检监察机关深入基层沉到一线
以实调研筑牢工作基础
二十届中央纪委二次全会强调,用好深学习、实调研、抓落实工作方法,打造敢于善于斗争的纪检监察铁军。贯彻落实全会精神,更好谋划未来工作,各级纪检监察机关积极引导广大纪检监察干部深入基层、沉到一线,扎实开展调查研究,以高质量调研为纪检监察工作高质量发展夯实基础。
日前,山东省纪委监委理论学习中心组进行集体学习,围绕深入学习贯彻党的二十大精神,全面落实党中央关于坚定不移全面从严治党的战略部署,结合年度重点课题调研成果开展研讨,并交流了省纪委监委领导班子成员、派驻纪检监察组、各市纪委监委的部分调研成果。
“省纪委监委制定了进一步加强调查研究工作的意见,提出4大重点调研方向,建立常态化调查研究、调查研究工作统筹协调、调查研究成果交流转化等5项调研制度,并明确调查研究纪律作风。”山东省纪委监委有关负责同志介绍,结合全省纪检监察机关“规范化法治化正规化建设年”,调研工作重点向规范化、法治化、正规化建设侧重,不断推动解决制约纪检监察工作高质量发展的突出问题。
据了解,这些调研课题回应的都是当前面临的十分紧要和紧迫的现实问题,既有对党的十九大以来腐败问题涉及重点领域、黄河重大国家战略专项监督等综合性工作的分析思考,也有对精准问责、村(社区)巡察、审查调查思想政治工作等重点业务的研究梳理;既有对发挥审理部门审核把关和监督制约作用的解剖透视,也有对派驻机构监督执纪办案、国企和高校纪检监察体制改革的积极探索……结合各调研组不断研究新情况、提出新思路、破解新难题的实际,山东省纪委监委将评选出优秀调研成果印发全省纪检监察机关,推动调研成果转化运用。
“市级针对派驻机构本身的专门性业务规范相对较少也比较分散,亟需‘天津版’配套制度”“实践中,派驻机构工作程序、审批流程和内部管理等需进一步优化”……在天津市纪委监委召开的调研座谈会上,来自河西、河东区纪委监委和驻市委办公厅纪检监察组等7家市纪委监委派驻(出)机构负责同志,围绕加强和规范纪检监察机关派驻机构工作,结合联系派驻机构实践中的经验做法、遇到的难点堵点问题,进行深入交流讨论,并提出有针对性的意见建议。
天津市纪委监委在起草派驻机构工作实施细则过程中,面向全市纪检监察系统118个单位和部门展开三轮调研,收集到意见建议1181条及相关问题73个。“通过深入调研,既系统了解了全市派驻机构改革成效,又准确掌握了派驻实践中在理念思路、改革落实、业务运行等方面存在的问题及制度细化需求,为高质量完成起草任务提供了实践基础。”该市纪委监委有关部门负责同志介绍,目前,实施细则已经顺利制定出台,在其中也专门作出了规定,把开展专题调查研究作为“室组”联动监督的重要内容。
把坚持问题导向作为实调研和抓落实的出发点和落脚点。江西省纪委监委深化“三不腐”一体推进,聚焦工程建设领域、国有企业、招商引资等14个专题,开展重点领域反腐败突出问题研究工作,并结合调研情况分类施策。黑龙江省纪委监委聚焦推进受贿行贿一起查、加强农村基层“微腐败”治理、提升高校纪检监察机构政治监督实效性等一系列贴近黑龙江纪检监察工作实际的内容,开展有益推动高质量发展的调查研究,做到研究一个课题、形成一份报告、解决一个领域问题。
近日,福建省宁德市纪委监委传承弘扬“四下基层”优良作风,围绕全面推进乡村振兴,聚焦农村党员干部信访举报情况,在线上全面汇总梳理的基础上,深入部分县(市、区)田间地头了解真实情况,通过实地走访、座谈交流、查阅案卷资料等方式开展专题调研。
“调研发现,当前涉及农村党员干部的信访举报主要集中在五个方面。农村‘三资’管理方面,主要表现为违规处置集体资金,低价出租集体资产,乱发、滥发津补贴;村级工程建设领域,主要表现为项目建设过程中规避招投标,以他人名义承揽工程或将工程项目私分给亲友……”针对调研发现的问题,宁德市纪委监委提出推动监督重心下沉、加强靶向监督治理、深化协作监督机制等具体建议。
为更加规范、更加有力、更加有效推进基层纪检监察工作高质量发展,宁德市纪委监委在深入开展调查研究的基础上,建立了乡镇纪委监察组履职“1+N”机制,着力解决部分乡镇纪委主责主业不明晰、履职监督不精准、制度机制不健全、衔接配合不顺畅、能力素质不过硬等短板弱项问题。(中国纪检监察报 记者 李灵娜)
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() ![]() 彩神注册地图 |